Watch, Follow, &
Connect with Us

Please visit our new home

Public Report
Report From: QualityCentral/Client Interface    [ Add a report in this area ]  
Report #:  98661   Status: Reported
Replace QC with a better system
Project:  QualityCentral Build #:  42
Version:    1.0 Submitted By:   Hans-Peter Suter
Report Type:  Feature Specification issue Date Reported:  9/7/2011 8:26:08 AM
Severity:    Extreme corner case Last Updated: 10/11/2011 7:16:02 PM
Platform:    All platforms Internal Tracking #:  
Resolution: None  Resolved in Build: : None
Duplicate of:  None
Voting and Rating
Overall Rating: (3 Total Ratings)
4.67 out of 5
Total Votes: 50
QC provides an utterly terrible user experience: slower than a dog and the interfaces (both, web & client) are uglier than a mud fence! It feels so antiquated that one looses all trust/will before even having started...

It would be so _very_ important that an issue tracker is a joy to use and *efficient*!

IMHO you should scrap everything and switch to one of the great issue tracking systems out there!

I like your recent XE2 release and you were able to improve the quality in former releases.

Please do something about this embarassing QC. Thanks and have a nice day!

PS: and you should switch to git yesterday already... (maybe people would send in patches then)
Steps to Reproduce:
use QC and be (just a little bit) critical

Daniel Terhell at 10/29/2011 1:27:00 PM -
The web and the GUI client are two jokes.

These masterpieces may have been designed by the same people who have to fix the bugs that get filed here so they may be comfortable by the current quality standards.

They say the factors of succcess of a business do not add up but multiply.  So if one of them, say the bug reporting system reaches zero, you can do the maths.

Martin Banke Jensen at 3/6/2013 6:17:46 AM -
If you (Embarcadero) does not want to replace the Quality Central with another system, how about putting the Quality Central client out as open source, so it would be possible to enhance it?

As it is now it works terribly slow, and the User Interface is not user friendly!

Server Response from: ETNACODE01