Watch, Follow, &
Connect with Us

Reports for: Delphi-BCB/Compiler/C++/Front End/Initialization  

Report Status Legend:
Open Reported Resolved Closed Withdrawn Private

Report#TitleRatingStatus
106892 can't structure variable to initialization
0.00 out of 5
Open
96963 Problems with long double variable
0.00 out of 5
Closed
96057 Dynamic initialisation not ordered
0.00 out of 5
Closed
93319 Incorrect error E2524 when initializing ALL members of a struct which has a property
0.00 out of 5
Open
84279 Internal compiler error (F1004), value-initializing member function pointer by "new T()"
0.00 out of 5
Closed
83751 Value-initialization: arrays should have each element value-initialized
0.00 out of 5
Closed
78255 Constructor not called for file scoped variables
0.00 out of 5
Need Feedback
74666 constant initialisation not used
5.00 out of 5
Open
63605 invalid struct initialization with no diagnostic, but program crashes
5.00 out of 5
Open
51854 Value-initialization: POD struct should be zero-initialized
5.00 out of 5
Closed
19550 (Pulled) Plum Hall 4.0 test of WP Dec96 12.6.1 (2) fails with error message.
5.00 out of 5
Closed
19548 (Pulled) Plum Hall 4.0 test of 5.3.4 (14) fails.
5.00 out of 5
Closed
19512 (Pulled) Plum Hall test of FDIS 15.2 (placement new syntax) fails.
5.00 out of 5
Open
19430 (Pulled) [ANSI] Plum Hall test shows that BCC32 doesn't emit a diagnostic when an attempt is made to invoke a function having a formal p
5.00 out of 5
Closed
19252 (Pulled) Plum Hall test of 5.3.4 (15) fails.  Using () to indicate default initialization on new of an array of int.
5.00 out of 5
Open
19117 (Pulled) When a class has a user-defined constructor, the array operator new doesn't return the correct value. #if ( __BORLANDC__ >= 0x5
0.00 out of 5
Open
19089 (Pulled) Compiler does not allow the new syntax:   new int[2] ().  This is explained in 5.3.4 (15). int main() {   int *pi = new int
5.00 out of 5
Open
18981 (Pulled) When a class has a user-defined constructor, the array operator new doesn't return the correct value. #if ( __BORLANDC__ >= 0x5
0.00 out of 5
Open
18953 (Pulled) Compiler does not allow the new syntax:   new int[2] ().  This is explained in 5.3.4 (15). int main() {   int *pi = new int
0.00 out of 5
Open
18838 (Pulled) Code gets error Expression expected. According to the C++ standard, section 8.5, paragraph 1, the following code is legal: int
0.00 out of 5
Closed
18766 (Pulled) Incorrect compiler error when initializing static variables with constructor syntax. struct Foo {   static int x; }; int Fo
0.00 out of 5
Closed
18705 (Pulled) [ANSI] Contrary to ANSI 8.4.3, paragraph 4, the compiler does not allow the initialization of a const reference return type wit
5.00 out of 5
Closed
18655 (Pulled) This code from the standard 14.1(6) should get an error: template <int i> void f() {     int &ri = i;  //error } int
0.00 out of 5
Closed
18617 (Pulled) Compiler is not allowing the initialization of a const integral array within the class declaration.
0.00 out of 5
Open
18561 (Pulled) Temporary copies of objects will not bind to references of that object. Run the code in the steps section and you will get th
0.00 out of 5
Closed
18469 (Pulled) (WP12.6.1p2) Compiler does not do initialization of aggregates containing class types.
0.00 out of 5
Closed
2828 A reference to non-const  should not bind to temporary variable
3.60 out of 5
Closed
< Prev Next >

Server Response from: ETNACODE01