Watch, Follow, &
Connect with Us

QualityCentral

Reports for: Delphi-BCB/Compiler/C++/Front End/Overloading  

Report Status Legend:
Open Reported Resolved Closed Withdrawn Private

Report#TitleRatingStatus
100145 Overload resolution fails with rvalue references (and template resolution?)
0.00 out of 5
Open
92469 Ambigous function templates
0.00 out of 5
Open
85374 Member function ambiguity cannot be resolved with static_cast<>()
0.00 out of 5
Open
83495 wrong overload resolution
0.00 out of 5
Closed
77051 Pure virtual function call jumps to the wrong function!
0.00 out of 5
Closed
76357 multiple declaration for luabind
0.00 out of 5
Reported
56382 Using declaration plays an incorrect part in overload resolution
5.00 out of 5
Open
51811 function template overloading ambiguity
5.00 out of 5
Open
48857 Could not find a match for function that is present.
4.00 out of 5
Open
19237 (Pulled) Compiler does not accept explicit call to compiler generated assignment operator.
5.00 out of 5
Open
19116 (Pulled) [C++ Error] Project2.cpp(27): E2015 Ambiguity between 'Bar::bar(void (Derived::*)())' and 'Bar::bar(int Derived::*)'.The followi
4.00 out of 5
Closed
19059 (Pulled) This code shows that the compiler is incorrectly giving an ambiguity on a ctor that can take both a const and a const volatile p
0.00 out of 5
Closed
19010 (Pulled) Compiler does not accept explicit call to compiler generated assignment operator.
0.00 out of 5
Open
18980 (Pulled) [C++ Error] Project2.cpp(27): E2015 Ambiguity between 'Bar::bar(void (Derived::*)())' and 'Bar::bar(int Derived::*)'.The followi
0.00 out of 5
Closed
18923 (Pulled) This code shows that the compiler is incorrectly giving an ambiguity on a ctor that can take both a const and a const volatile p
0.00 out of 5
Closed
18870 (Pulled) This code gets an ambiguity error.  The conversion operator returns value which should match more closely with the derived class
0.00 out of 5
Closed
18784 (Pulled) BCB doesn't find the conversion sequence Foo -> void (Foo::*)() -> bool in the following code. struct Foo; typedef void (Foo::
0.00 out of 5
Closed
18781 (Pulled) The attached code doesn't compile. There is no ambiguity since no conversion from Derived const * to Base * exists. It seems tha
0.00 out of 5
Closed
18711 (Pulled) BCB incorrectly flags an ambiguity when the a function is being passed a bool when the declaration of the function is either int
0.00 out of 5
Closed
18708 (Pulled) BCB doesn't allow explicit access to an implicitly declared assignment operator in violation of IS 12.1/1. struct Foo {}; Foo&
0.00 out of 5
Open
18637 (Pulled) ANSI 13.5.3 section 2.  The code in the standard is not correctly executed.  Specifically, the statement dobj1 = dobj2; is supp
5.00 out of 5
Closed
18569 (Pulled) Compiler returns ambiguity between const and non-const conversion operators. The code sample should not compile because the o
0.00 out of 5
Open
< Prev Next >

Server Response from: ETNACODE01

Copyright© 1994 - 2013 Embarcadero Technologies, Inc. All rights reserved.